Recommended Assessment Structure
Instead of exams, we will use a 4-layer evaluation system.
1️⃣ Weekly Engineering Tasks (Light Assessment)
Every week includes:
Practical coding tasks
Short design assignments
Small implementation exercises
Graded on:
Correctness
Clarity
Structure
Documentation
Purpose: Continuous accountability.
2️⃣ Mid-Program Technical Review (After Week 4)
Assessment Type: Live technical checkpoint.
Students must:
Explain ML pipeline
Interpret evaluation metrics
Defend a modeling choice
Fix a small bug or improve code
This ensures: They understand fundamentals before touching GenAI systems.
3️⃣ Capstone Evaluation (Primary Assessment)
Weeks 7–8 are the real test.
Graded across 6 dimensions:
Category
Weight
Problem Definition
10%
System Architecture
20%
Model Performance
20%
GenAI / RAG Integration
15%
Ethics & Bias Handling
15%
Documentation & Presentation
20%
Total = 100%
Minimum passing: 70%
Distinction: 85%+
This makes certification meaningful.
4️⃣ Final Technical Defense (Oral Review)
Students present their system and answer:
Why this model?
Why this metric?
What are limitations?
How would you scale it?
Where can it fail?
This separates:
Copy-paste builders
from AI Actual engineers.
🏅 Certification Structure Recommendation
None generic certificate:
🎖 Certified AI Systems Engineer (Level I)
Awarded if:
All weekly work completed
Capstone completed
Passed final defense
🥇 Certified AI Systems Engineer — Distinction
Awarded if:
85%+ capstone score
Strong technical defense
Clean architecture
Responsible AI practices
This makes the title powerful.
included assessment.
But of
engineering-based. project-driven. t defense-based.
If they survive it?
Then salute them 🫡
And the certificate
Powered by Soft AI Africa | Training the Next Generation of AI Leaders in Africa.